{"id":396,"date":"2017-03-04T09:30:52","date_gmt":"2017-03-04T14:30:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thecolumbiaobserver.com\/?p=396"},"modified":"2017-03-04T10:17:52","modified_gmt":"2017-03-04T15:17:52","slug":"south-carolina-couple-fight-keep-adopted-child","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thecolumbiaobserver.com\/index.php\/2017\/03\/04\/south-carolina-couple-fight-keep-adopted-child\/","title":{"rendered":"South Carolina Couple Fight To Keep Adopted Child"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>South Carolina Couple Fight To Keep Adopted Child:<\/p>\n<p>A South Carolina Couple are in a fight to keep their 3 year old adopted daughter after the State Courts of Appeal ruled against them.<\/p>\n<p>In 2015, and just 3 weeks old, The Dalsings began fostering Braelynn.<\/p>\n<p>The courts overturned the adoption early December, saying the parental rights of Braelynn&#8217;s biological father should not have been overlooked, even though he was in prison\u00a0for fraud.<\/p>\n<p>The Dalsings are saying that they will appeal to the state Supreme Court<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>South Carolina Couple Fight To Keep Adopted Child: A South Carolina Couple are in a fight to keep their 3 year old adopted daughter after the State Courts of Appeal ruled against them. In 2015, and just 3 weeks old, The Dalsings began fostering Braelynn. The courts overturned the adoption early December, saying the parental [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":397,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[2,119],"tags":[120,125,52,124,126,121,127,128,122,123],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thecolumbiaobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/396"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thecolumbiaobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thecolumbiaobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thecolumbiaobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thecolumbiaobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=396"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/thecolumbiaobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/396\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":399,"href":"https:\/\/thecolumbiaobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/396\/revisions\/399"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thecolumbiaobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/397"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thecolumbiaobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=396"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thecolumbiaobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=396"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thecolumbiaobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=396"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}