{"id":174,"date":"2017-02-07T17:45:44","date_gmt":"2017-02-07T22:45:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thecolumbiaobserver.com\/?p=174"},"modified":"2017-03-04T08:48:42","modified_gmt":"2017-03-04T13:48:42","slug":"carolina-panthers-trouble","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thecolumbiaobserver.com\/index.php\/2017\/02\/07\/carolina-panthers-trouble\/","title":{"rendered":"Carolina Panthers In Trouble Again"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>If there ever was a phrase to describe the 2016-2017 season for the Carolina Panthers, it would be the call &#8220;The Carolina Panthers are in Trouble again.&#8221; After a 15-1 season, and eventual Super Bowl loss to Denver in the 2015-16 season, the Panthers had high hopes of a repeat season. Unfortunately,\u00a0the Super Bowl curse continued with the Panthers.<\/p>\n<p>Finishing the season at 6-10, there wasn&#8217;t just one area the Panthers lacked in. In fact, in many of their matches\u00a0this season, the Panthers looked less like a Super Bowl team and more like a junior varsity High School squad. Newton, praised as the best player\u00a0of the team a year before, spent most of his time in the pocket waiting for a open man, mostly because his receivers couldn&#8217;t shake their opponents. Not to mention the astounding number of sacks allowed by his offensive line.<\/p>\n<p>Then you take\u00a0Kelvin Benjamin, the Panther&#8217;s all-star wide receiver. In the game this season verses San Francisco, Benjamin looked like the all star he is. The next week when the Panthers played the Vikings, he didn&#8217;t have one touch on the pigskin. Their loss isn&#8217;t attributed to Benjamin&#8217;s lack of a hands. Rather, it was partly because the other receivers couldn&#8217;t get open. The entire season, the Panther&#8217;s faced a one-on-one coverage similar to that which the Broncos used in their Super Bowl win.<\/p>\n<p>One writer summed up the Panther&#8217;s less than mediocre season like this; &#8220;The Panthers looked lethargic, confused and not very talented.&#8221; This described their entire season perfectly. Despite the cast of players that Ron Rivera had gathered this season, the Panther&#8217;s seemed to lack the talent to make a repeat season. After such a failure of a season, fans are anxious to know\u00a0can the Panther&#8217;s regroup in the off-season and get a do over for the 2017-2018 season? Or will the will the disappointment continue\u00a0and the fans grow tired of the Rivera era.<\/p>\n<p>Rivera told Espn in a recent interview, &#8220;Our top runner cannot be our quarterback,&#8221; hinting that they will feature more 2 RB sets and have additional TE&#8217;s. This next season will prove to fans just how strong and resilient the Panthers can be.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>If there ever was a phrase to describe the 2016-2017 season for the Carolina Panthers, it would be the call &#8220;The Carolina Panthers are in Trouble again.&#8221; After a 15-1 season, and eventual Super Bowl loss to Denver in the 2015-16 season, the Panthers had high hopes of a repeat season. Unfortunately,\u00a0the Super Bowl curse [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":175,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[119,20],"tags":[31,30,32],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thecolumbiaobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thecolumbiaobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thecolumbiaobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thecolumbiaobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thecolumbiaobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=174"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/thecolumbiaobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":184,"href":"https:\/\/thecolumbiaobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174\/revisions\/184"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thecolumbiaobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/175"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thecolumbiaobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=174"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thecolumbiaobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=174"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thecolumbiaobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=174"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}